Consensus statement on the use of biosimilar drugs in immune-mediated diseases in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve knowledge about biosimilar medicines and to generate a consensus framework on their use. METHODS: Qualitative study. A multidisciplinary group of experts in biosimilar medicines was established (1dermatologist, 1hospital pharmacist, 1rheumatologist, and 1gastroenterologist) who defined the sections and topics of the document. A narrative literature review was performed in Medline to identify articles on biosimilar medicines. Systematic reviews, controlled, pre-clinical, clinical, and real-life studies were selected. Based on the results of the review, several general principles and recommendations were generated. The level of agreement was tested in a Delphi that was extended to 66 health professionals who voted from 1 (totally disagree) to 10 (totally agree). Agreement was defined if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥7. RESULTS: The literature review included 555 articles. A total of 10 general principles and recommendations were voted upon. All reached the level of agreement established. The document includes data on the main characteristics of biosimilar medicines (definition, development, approval, indication extrapolation, interchangeability, financing, and traceability); published evidence (biosimilarity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, immunogenicity, efficiency, switch); barriers and facilitators to its use; and data on information for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Authorized biosimilar medicines meet all the characteristics of quality, efficacy, and safety. They also significantly help improve patient access to biological therapies and contribute to health system sustainability.

Documento de consenso sobre los medicamentos biosimilares en enfermedades inmunomediadas en España / Consensus statement on the use of biosimilar drugs in immune-mediated diseases in Spain

Objetivo: Mejorar el nivel de conocimiento sobre los medicamentos biosimilares y generar un marco consensuado sobre su uso. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo. Se seleccionó un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos en medicamentos biosimilares (una dermatóloga, un farmacéutico de hospital, un reumatólogo y un gastroenterólogo) que definieron los apartados y los temas del documento. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura en Medline para identificar artículos sobre los medicamentos biosimilares. Se seleccionaron revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura, estudios controlados pre-clínicos, clínicos y en vida real. Con esta información se generaron varios principios generales y recomendaciones. El grado de acuerdo con los mismos se estableció mediante un Delphi que se extendió a 66 profesionales de la salud que votaron de 1 (totalmente en desacuerdo) a 10 (totalmente de acuerdo). Se definió acuerdo si al menos el 70% de los participantes votaron ≥7. Resultados: La revisión de la literatura incluyó 555 artículos. Se votaron un total de 10 principios generales y recomendaciones. Todos alcanzaron el nivel de acuerdo establecido en el Delphi. El documento incluye datos sobre las características principales de los medicamentos biosimilares (definición, desarrollo, aprobación, extrapolación de indicaciones, intercambiabilidad, financiación y trazabilidad); sobre la evidencia publicada (biosimilitud, eficacia, efectividad, seguridad, inmunogenicidad, eficiencia, switch); sobre barreras y facilitadores a su uso, y datos sobre la información para pacientes. Conclusiones: Los medicamentos biosimilares autorizados reúnen todas las características de calidad, eficacia y seguridad. Además, ayudan significativamente a mejorar el acceso de los pacientes a las terapias biológicas y contribuyen a la sostenibilidad de los sistemas sanitarios. (AU)

Objective: To improve knowledge about biosimilar medicines and to generate a consensus framework on their use. Methods: Qualitative study. A multidisciplinary group of experts in biosimilar medicines was established (1dermatologist, 1hospital pharmacist, 1rheumatologist, and 1gastroenterologist) who defined the sections and topics of the document. A narrative literature review was performed in Medline to identify articles on biosimilar medicines. Systematic reviews, controlled, pre-clinical, clinical, and real-life studies were selected. Based on the results of the review, several general principles and recommendations were generated. The level of agreement was tested in a Delphi that was extended to 66 health professionals who voted from 1 (totally disagree) to 10 (totally agree). Agreement was defined if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥7. Results: The literature review included 555 articles. A total of 10 general principles and recommendations were voted upon. All reached the level of agreement established. The document includes data on the main characteristics of biosimilar medicines (definition, development, approval, indication extrapolation, interchangeability, financing, and traceability); published evidence (biosimilarity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, immunogenicity, efficiency, switch); barriers and facilitators to its use; and data on information for patients. Conclusions: Authorized biosimilar medicines meet all the characteristics of quality, efficacy, and safety. They also significantly help improve patient access to biological therapies and contribute to health system sustainability. (AU)

Septotomía endoscópica del divertículo de Zenker mediante Stag-Beetle-KnifeTM: estudio observacional descriptivo y revisión de la literatura / Endoscopic septotomy of Zenker's diverticulum with Stag-Beetle Knife™: A descriptive observational study and literature review

Introducción: El divertículo de Zenker (DZ) es una protrusión de la mucosa hipofaríngea con una prevalencia de 2/100.000 habitantes. La clínica condiciona la necesidad del tratamiento, pudiendo ser quirúrgico o endoscópico. Este último, denominado septotomía o diverticulotomía endoscópica (DE), consiste en la disección del septo diverticular, pudiendo realizarse con distintos dispositivos disectores. Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de la DE mediante el dispositivo Stag-Beetle Knife™, así como realizar una revisión de la literatura para valorar el posicionamiento de la técnica en el panorama científico actual. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo que incluye pacientes intervenidos mediante DE con SB-Knife™ entre junio de 2017 y febrero de 2020. Revisión de la literatura de la evidencia disponible entre enero de 2013 y abril 2020 de la DE mediante la técnica con SB-Knife™ y sus variantes. Resultados: Se recopilaron 12 pacientes (66% varones) con una mediana de 70,5 años. El tamaño diverticular fue de 32,5mm de mediana y la remisión completa se objetivó en el 75% de los casos. Se realizaron 14 intervenciones con un éxito técnico del 92,8%. No se produjeron complicaciones graves. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura encontrando 13 trabajos de los cuales se incluyeron finalmente 8 (6 estudios retrospectivos, una serie de casos y un caso clínico). Conclusiones: En función de nuestra experiencia y a la bibliografía revisada, consideramos que la DE mediante SB-Knife™ es una técnica segura, eficaz y reproducible, pudiendo ser una mejor alternativa a la cirugía en pacientes con DZ.(AU)

Introduction: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a protrusion of the hypopharyngeal mucosa with a prevalence of 2/100,000 inhabitants. The symptoms of the patients determine the need for treatment, which can be surgical or endoscopic. The latter, known as endoscopic septotomy or diverticulotomy (ED), this involves dissecting the diverticular septum, which can be performed with different dissection devices. AimThe aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ED with Stag-Beetle-Knife™ device, as well as to conduct a literature review to assess the position of the technique in the current scientific panorama. Material and methods: Descriptive retrospective study that includes patients who underwent ED with SB-Knife™ between June 2017 and February 2020. Literature review of the available evidence between January 2013 and April 2020 of ED with SB-Knife™ technique and its variants. Results: Twelve patients (66% male) with a median age of 70.5 years were collected. The median size of diverticular was 32.5mm and complete remission was observed in 75% of the cases. Fourteen interventions were performed with a technical success of 92.8. There were no serious complications. A literature review was carried out, finding 13 papers, of which 8 were finally included (6 retrospective studies, a series of cases and a clinical case). Conclusion: Based on our experience and the reviewed literature, we consider ED with SB-Knife™ is a safe, effective and reproducible technique, and may be a better alternative to surgery in patients with ZD.(AU)

Endoscopic septotomy of Zenker's diverticulum with Stag-Beetle Knife™: A descriptive observational study and literature review. / Septotomía endoscópica del divertículo de Zenker mediante Stag-Beetle-KnifeTM: estudio observacional descriptivo y revisión de la literatura.

INTRODUCTION: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a protrusion of the hypopharyngeal mucosa with a prevalence of 2/100,000 inhabitants. The symptoms of the patients determine the need for treatment, which can be surgical or endoscopic. The latter, known as endoscopic septotomy or diverticulotomy (ED), this involves dissecting the diverticular septum, which can be performed with different dissection devices. AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ED with Stag-Beetle-Knife™ device, as well as to conduct a literature review to assess the position of the technique in the current scientific panorama. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive retrospective study that includes patients who underwent ED with SB-Knife™ between June 2017 and February 2020. Literature review of the available evidence between January 2013 and April 2020 of ED with SB-Knife™ technique and its variants. RESULTS: Twelve patients (66% male) with a median age of 70.5 years were collected. The median size of diverticular was 32.5mm and complete remission was observed in 75% of the cases. Fourteen interventions were performed with a technical success of 92.8. There were no serious complications. A literature review was carried out, finding 13 papers, of which 8 were finally included (6 retrospective studies, a series of cases and a clinical case). CONCLUSION: Based on our experience and the reviewed literature, we consider ED with SB-Knife™ is a safe, effective and reproducible technique, and may be a better alternative to surgery in patients with ZD.